Quote:
It has taken a lot of time and effort to gain the first glimpse (presumably) of gravity waves. What will make the next “sighting” easier than the first?


let me get these images and post them here to discuss them.



the image below the label (Livingston louisiana)

shows two images H1 and L1 one on top of the other.
I can understand why the image H1 was shifted
possibly to try to get the lines to line up
but why would there be a need to invert the H1 image?

inverting the images to make them fit seems a little
shifty to me and reminds me a little of the manipulated
climate data images we get to see all the time.

Bill S , I don't really see what the big deal is about this
it most likely was some gravity differences measured from
our earth due to some disturbance in the earths gravity field
because the starting point on all the graphs is the exact
same ending point on all the graphs and there is no increase
of gravity shown at the ending point of any of the graphs.

Im not against technical advances to better mankind but
I don't think they are thinking this through it seems like
they may be pushing it through in hopes of getting funding
to build more of the same.

I certainly would wait several decades before I would just
dump any funding into it myself if I were in charge of the
funding programs that they might apply for.

they have waited 5 months to release their findings
on this which tells me that there must have been a lot of
political drama going on in their social community to
decide what would look best to release and how to spin it.

anyway to answer your question in my opinion the thing
that would make it more easier for them to get the next
result would be for them to need the next result before they
could get more funding.

oh and orac , I don't have bubbles.



3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.