I love to burst your bubble there orac.
so I must.
1) the images that I looked at on the bottom link do not
appear to be due to two black holes merging.
1a) the images show an increase and then a decrease.
1b) if there would have been a merger the images would not
have shown an decrease only a steady increase.
1c) as the two black holes merged the two gravity fields
would merge and there would never have been a lower gravity
as shown on the images.
2) I don't know what the devices picked up and neither do
they if they are saying it was two black holes merging.
2a) the article states that it was predicted by einsteins
e=mc^2 , if mass cannot travel faster than the speed of
light in a vacuum then the mass used in the equation
cannot be multiplied by c^2.
three times the mass of the Sun or a million times the mass of the Earth — were converted into pure energy via Einstein’s E = mc^2.
lies lies and lies heaped upon lies.
plus: the article states that the merger spewed out a gravity wave spiral.
gravity does not spiral or move it only increases
or decreases in intensity with increased or decreased mass.
I was curious how the crackpots would describe the findings
to make it seem as if Einstein had predicted something correctly and lawd was I right.
are we really supposed to believe that these two massive
black holes merged in only the 15 seconds depicted on the
images?
and that the only detectable differences in gravity occurred
in a mere 20 milliseconds?
I find these last two claims to be unbelievable.
