Actually I did type it , but I read it somewhere because someone
else had already typed it first.

of course.

Quote:
However if it did, the neutrinos from SN1987A would have arrived
sometime in 1984.


when you did your calculation did you also include the faster than light expansion of the universe?

that may be how you got the 1984 arrival time.

I see that they have corrected the measurement to that of the
speed of light , so it was 168,000 years before 1987
when the SN occured
and your calculation covers the distance of 168,000 light years
and the expansion of the universe I assume , because science
claims that light expands as the universe expands.

but do particles expand as the universe expands?

were the detected particles oblong due to their expansion?

can we expect to find oblong expanded objects in space?

of course 168,000 years ago + 26 years the universe was not expanding as fast as it was
in 1987 , so I also assume that you began your calculation with the acceleration of the universe at 168,000 light years away from the earth and wherever the earth was at 168,000 years ago + 26 years.

and ended your calculation with the acceleration of the universe in 1987.

and the location of the earth in 1987.

can I safely assume that you included the above necessary elements into your equation?

I just thought of something that may be critical , you dont
have a toolbox that contains any tools that you can use
to calculate anything that has non zero mass and that travels at or faster than light so please excuse my questioning
of your methods of calculation.

sry.











3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.