Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
a serious question to the forum
by paul
Today at 02:43 PM
The Concept of the Whole and Threadism
by Kyra M
Today at 02:47 AM
Why is our blood red
by janelee
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Unified Field Theory?
by TheodoreToth
Yesterday at 08:41 PM
CFL - tempers in the house of (representatives ? )
by paul
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
New IPCC climate warning
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Penis enlargement surprise: it's possible
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2009 News

Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets reviews this week's science titles and lists his all-time faves.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


18 June 2008
Male Homosexuality Placed In Darwinian Context
by Kate Melville

Writing about their findings in the journal PLoS ONE, Italian researchers say that male homosexuality in humans can be explained by a model based on sexually antagonistic selection, where genetic factors spread in the population by giving a reproductive advantage to one sex while disadvantaging the other.

It's generally believed that male homosexuality is influenced by psycho-social factors as well as a genetic component. But male homosexuality is difficult to explain under Darwinian evolutionary models as carriers of genes predisposing towards male homosexuality would be likely to reproduce less than average, suggesting that homosexuality should progressively disappear from a population.

Now, however, Andrea Camperio Ciani and Giovanni Zanzotto at the University of Padova and Paolo Cermelli at the University of Turin say that sexually antagonistic selection can explain the persistence of male homosexuality. Their work is based on a previous study that found that females in the maternal line of male homosexuals were more fertile than average.

Sexually antagonistic selection is a particular aspect of Darwinian evolution in which genetic factors spread in the population by giving a reproductive advantage to one sex while disadvantaging the other. This type of evolutionary behavior has been previously found in insects, birds, and some mammals, but never in humans.

The newly developed model shows that the interaction of male homosexuality with increased female fecundity within human populations is a complex dynamic, resulting in the maintenance of male homosexuality at stable and relatively low frequencies. The researchers say that their findings invite a shift in thinking away from homosexuality being viewed as a detrimental trait (evolutionarily speaking), instead putting it within the wider evolutionary framework of a characteristic with gender-specific benefits, which promotes female fecundity.

Delivering a fecundity benefit to one sex while disadvantaging the other is a key mechanism through which high levels of genetic variation are maintained in biological populations, say the researchers. They contend that male homosexuality is just the first example of an unknown number of sexually antagonistic traits, which contribute to the maintenance of the natural genetic variability of humans.

An unexpected implication of this hypothesis concerns the impact that the sexually antagonistic genetic factors for male homosexuality have on the overall fecundity of a population. The findings suggest that the proportion of male homosexuals may signal a corresponding proportion of females with higher fecundity. Fascinatingly, these factors always contribute - all else being equal - to a positive net increase of the fecundity of the whole population. This increase grows as the population baseline fecundity decreases; meaning that the genes influencing male homosexuality end up playing the role of a "buffer" on any external factors lowering the overall fecundity of the whole population.

Related:
For Sheep, Homosexuality Is In The Genes
Homo Superior
Switching Gayness On And Off
Evolutionary Risk Distribution Law Identified

Source: Public Library of Science



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.