Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
a serious question to the forum
by Zephir
0 seconds ago
The Concept of the Whole and Threadism
by Kyra M
Today at 02:47 AM
Why is our blood red
by janelee
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Unified Field Theory?
by TheodoreToth
Yesterday at 08:41 PM
CFL - tempers in the house of (representatives ? )
by paul
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
New IPCC climate warning
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Penis enlargement surprise: it's possible
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2009 News

Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets reviews this week's science titles and lists his all-time faves.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


18 April 2007
Ethanol Vehicles A Health Hazard
by Kate Melville

Ethanol advocates say that it's a clean-burning fuel that is friendly to the environment. But a study by Stanford scientists found that if all US vehicles ran on ethanol, the number of respiratory-related deaths and hospitalizations would likely increase. "Our results show that a high blend of ethanol poses an equal or greater risk to public health than gasoline, which already causes significant health damage,'' said Stanford University atmospheric scientist Mark Z. Jacobson.

Jacobson's work, reported in Environmental Science & Technology, involved the simulation of atmospheric conditions throughout the United States in 2020, with a special focus on Los Angeles. He simulated two scenarios; all vehicles fueled by gasoline, and all vehicles fueled by E85 (a blend of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline).

Jacobson said the results of the computer simulations were striking. ''We found that E85 vehicles reduce atmospheric levels of two carcinogens, benzene and butadiene, but increase two others - formaldehyde and acetaldehyde,'' he explained. ''As a result, cancer rates for E85 are likely to be similar to those for gasoline. However, E85 significantly increased ozone, a prime ingredient of smog.''

Ozone can decrease lung capacity, inflame lung tissue, worsen asthma and impair the body's immune system. The simulations revealed that E85 would increase ozone-related mortalities by about 4 percent in the U.S. and 9 percent in Los Angeles.

The study noted that the deleterious health effects of E85 will be the same, whether the ethanol is made from corn, switchgrass or other plant products. ''Today, there is a lot of investment in ethanol,'' Jacobson said. ''But we found that using E85 will cause at least as much health damage as gasoline, which already causes about 10,000 U.S. premature deaths annually from ozone and particulate matter. If we're not getting any health benefits, then why continue to promote ethanol and other biofuels?"

Related:

Ozone - The Pollutant That Got Away
Study Slams Economics Of Ethanol And Biodiesel

Source: Stanford University



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.