I would leave a little open excercise for ImagingGeek if he wants to take up the challenge.

The nasty problem I am left with he is how do we measure and define complexity or if you prefer "information left to learn" it is not going to be a simple as count genomes or anything like that because the fitness criteria imposed was complex.

In the article which basically double checked my maths


He tagged this into the work of John Maynard Smith which as an outsider from biology I know nothing about.

So perhaps if ImagingGeek could update us with how John Maynard Smiths work is viewed in modern biology and lets look at it from there.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.