Originally Posted By: Rallem
No it was their choice to reject the food for fear of contamination.

I'm ignorant of the case in question, but I wouldn't be surprised if that statement is met with considerable scepticism. After all, they were probably at least several hundred thousand people. Since there was obviously no referendum involved, one can only assume that someone took it upon themselves to speak for them. Who, I wonder?

"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler