Tell me samwik what you find amusing about what anyman wrote. Here's my analysis paragraph by paragraph.

1. "he whines about intolerance and yet is among the most intolerant of all humans"

Has nothing to do with science.

2. "his philosophy ... is so bankrupt...and so easily shown to be false"

But anyman doesn't and can't.

What anyman wrote might work on Monty Python but it doesn't expose of substance.

Dawkins books is, in my mind, primarily a rock thrown back at all of those who have been throwing rocks at him. And rock throwers, no matter who they are, don't win intellectual arguments.

DA Morgan