On the question of God v Dawkins in a court of law would not prof Dawkins be denying the very existence of himself by denying a power greater than himself?Even if everything started from nothing, happening at random etc.Is that not `god`?What i am saying is even if everything was started by `nothing`it does not mean to say nothing is not intelligent if you see what i mean....I think prof Dawkins sees `god` as a `being`.