Quote:
Originally posted by anyman:
in short...utterly (dawkins is utterly delusional :-)

he whines about intolerance and yet is among the most intolerant of all humans

his philosophy (which is such a common, prevalent, widely touted philosophy...albeit immediately self-defeating :-) is so bankrupt...and so easily shown to be false...

ok, let's have a go...

intolerance is wrong

really?

yes, absolutely

so you are saying that you will not tolerate intolerance?

yes, absolutely not

why you intolerant bigot...you two faced bonehead :-)

next...

there are no ablsolutes

really?

yes, really!

are you sure?

quite sure!

are you absolutely sure?

absolutely!

ungh, hack, hack...

well, i'm not really absolutely sure, but...i mean, but, but, but, i mean...you know what i mean...

eh, sorry, what exactly, absolutely DO you mean?

hmmm :-)

next :-)
I don't think you've really captured the essence of Dawkins' main argument here, anyman. If you're going to criticize a body of work, surely you'd agree that it's better that you attempt to chip away at an opponent's strongest points.