Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Recent Posts
Optica! (May 12, 2008)
benito
Yesterday at 10:31 PM
Mars landing in 21 Days
odin1
Yesterday at 07:35 PM
Philosophy of Religions--all religions, including,
Ellis
Yesterday at 06:26 PM
The platypus genome sequenced
redewenur
Yesterday at 02:49 PM
Zealotry over Global Warming
RicS
Yesterday at 08:41 AM
edge of space; plausible
Mike Kremer
05/11/08 10:05 AM
How Reliable are those climate models?????
Canuck
05/10/08 06:38 PM
Biofuels Starve the Poor
redewenur
05/10/08 08:00 AM
Artic Ice Free by 2013 !!
samwik
05/10/08 01:07 AM
Semantics, Etymology, Syntactics, Etc.
samwik
05/10/08 12:10 AM
Hot Topics

The Environment

Evolution

Space

Mind/Brain

Electronics

Climate Change


Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones Gone Wild
Homo Superior
The Universe As Magic Roundabout
In Space, No One Can Hear You Say "Doh!"
Bow To Your Insect Overlords!
Bionics
Sex And The Schizoid Factor
Delusions And Mental Illness
We Come In Peace – NOT!
Eeew!
Small Penis Syndrome A Big Problem?
Have You Hugged Your Robot Today?
Down On The Farm - Yields, Nutrients And Soil Quality
Cat Parasite Has Global Ambitions
POP Goes The Planet
The Disappearing Male
Missing Link A Tripping Chimp?
Inorganic Dust Formations Alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2008 News

Rusty's Reading List
Sci Books
Join Rusty Rockets for the lowdown on what you should be reading.
Search
Google

Science a GoGo Web
Archives
2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussions
Features


29 March 2007
West Antarctic Ice Sheet Gets Climatologists Hot And Bothered
by Kate Melville

A statement just issued by a gaggle of polar ice scientists has warned that unless we come to grips with the mechanics of Antarctica's ice sheet bump-n-grind; we may face severe and unexpected consequences from sea level rise. Specifically, the scientists are referring to the West Antarctic ice sheet which contains enough water to lift sea levels by 70 meters. Importantly, the statement has been signed-off by dozens of polar climate experts from both the United States and Europe, making it difficult to discount.

The statement - issued after a three-day meeting at The University of Texas at Austin - points out that ice sheet changes are occurring rapidly in Antarctica and a lack of monitoring facilities means that frustrated scientists are not getting the full picture of what's happening.

In part, the document seeks to overturn the lack of consensus that was evident in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's report in February (see related articles below). To that end, the scientists have compiled a number of points that they say represent the new consensus about what is known about Antarctica's massive ice sheets.

Accord on several of these points has been lacking in the past, so the fact that the group are now in agreement marks an important turning point. The agreed points were:

  • Both the grounded ice sheet and the floating ice shelves of the Amundsen Sea Embayment have thinned over the last few decades.

  • Ice thinning is accelerating because melting beneath the ice shelves is reducing friction, causing the grounded ice sheet to move more quickly into the ocean.

  • Oceanic changes have caused the increased ice-shelf melting. Additionally, recent changes in winds around Antarctica caused by human influence and/or natural variability may be changing ocean currents, moving warmer waters under the ice shelves.

  • The possibility that accelerated melting beneath ice shelves will lead to "runaway" thinning of the grounded ice sheet. Current understanding is too limited to know whether, when, or how rapidly this might happen.

The scientists also noted that surprisingly rapid changes were occurring in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, a Texas-size region of the Antarctic Ice Sheet facing the southern Pacific Ocean.

But understanding where all this might lead is next to impossible, say the scientists, thanks to a lack of monitoring infrastructure. The only way to get to grips with the problem, they contend, is to ramp up our observational capabilities. They cite lack of satellite capability, remoteness, a paucity of oceanographic observations and inadequate continental-scale ice sheet models as the main areas that need to be addressed.

Related:
The Group's Website
Glacier Behavior Confounds Climate Pundits
Antarctic Snowfall Snafu Derails Climate Models
All Hands To The Pumps! Here Comes The Sea
NASA Confirms Recent Ice Sheet Losses

Source: The University of Texas at Austin



Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop   |   About
The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.