Home   |   News    |   Discussions   |   Books   |   Curiosities
Search
Custom Search
Popular Reads

Earthquakes and animal behavior
LHC may produce time travelling particles
Country boys boast bigger junk
Running the numbers on alien life
Uh-oh, placebo
Forgetful? Blame your house
Pill to blame for rise in prostate cancer?
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Carbon monoxide keeps city dwellers happy
Magnetic field alters moral judgments
Stars manufacturing organic matter?
Unnatural selection: Courtesy of The Pill
Men 2% funnier than women
Parasite rewires sexual attraction
Novel psychiatric drugs take aim at gut bacteria
Discussions
General Science

Not-Quite Science

Physics

Climate Change

Science Fiction

Past Forums

Sponsored Links
Browse

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Curiosities
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2012 2011 2010
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Feature Archive


29 November 2001
One Billion Deaths From Tobacco
by Kate Melville

In the October issue of the journal Nature Cancer Reviews, Penn State science historian Robert Proctor predicts that, left unchecked, tobacco products will cause up to one billion deaths by the end of the 21st century. Proctor's prediction is the result of his historical analysis of how many cigarettes it takes to produce a given level of mortality, plus an analysis of global smoking rates and trends. He shows that lung cancer was an extraordinarily rare disease before the 20th century, so rare that physicians were astonished whenever they saw a case. It was not even medically described until the 18th century and, for many years thereafter, was notoriously difficult to diagnose. A Penn State distinguished professor of history and co-director, Science, Medicine and Technology in Culture Initiative, he points out the direct correlation in the rise in incidences of lung cancer and the rise in the number of smokers.

Lung cancer was first linked to cigarettes in 1912 by physician and pathologist Isaac Adler, and several other medical professionals reasserted the link in subsequent years. However, the first formal quantitative analysis of the link did not occur until 1929, in Dresden, Germany. That same year, global cigarette consumption was already at around 600 billion cigarettes per year. It would rise to 10 times that amount by its peak in 1990. In his article, Proctor traces the medical research advances by which lung cancer was linked to cigarettes, the global spread of tobacco usage, the political obstacles to tobacco control, and the growth in cancer rates worldwide.

As a result, Proctor is able to present statistics showing there is about one lung cancer death for every 3 million cigarettes consumed. An important component to that statistic, he says, is that "cigarette smoke is unlike radon, asbestos, aniline dye or most other carcinogens in that the dosages delivered to the body are remarkably uniform. Cigarettes are pretty much the same size and composition throughout the world, as are the routes by which the body is exposed. And as consumption rates are carefully recorded by governments (primarily for taxation purposes), it is fairly easy to predict the long-term cancer consequences of a given level of consumption."


Social

Follow Science a GoGo


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2012 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.