Planck distance is a finite distance. I'm not asking what is smaller than Planck distance. All I am saying is that if something is infinitely small it does not exist in the material world.
Then you agree with science .. plank distance is a bounding condition for us.
Presumably this universe is not devoid of energy, so it is not nothingness.
Correct at science we would simply a universe devoid of matter and full of energy and possibly dark energy and matter if such things exist.
Undoubtedly this is mathematically true, but since you can never demonstrate that you have a positive or negative infinite number of anything, the argument is pointless in reality.
But I can have +5 and -5 and +10 and -10.
I urge you to read (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_(number))
It evokes the same problem
Records show that the ancient Greeks seemed unsure about the status of zero as a number. They asked themselves, "How can nothing be something?", leading to philosophical and, by the Medieval period, religious arguments about the nature and existence of zero and the vacuum
See I assure you it is exactly the same argument ... infact I did this exact dialog with my mate socratus (Israel Sadovnik Socratus).
I have seen this exact argument many times and it dates back to the medieval times.
Infinity in many ways is just a more modern version of the same dance over zero.
Hence the solution for science is that infinity can only be valid with a given context and zero falls to occum's razor it means the lack of something.
