....
Just in the two threads I mentioned, Orac has protested that aspects were “not science”. In your opinion, does that put him among the “clowns”?
There is plenty of room for philosophers and theologians, but simply because I acknowledge that scientists may express opinions about what is or is not, in their view, science, does not mean I am trying to exclude anyone.
Bill S:
Please accept my apology if in my questioning I came across like as if I think of myself as a prosecuting attorney. My intention was to get my own understanding and own thinking clear, not to question the sincere thoughts of others.
It is my sincere hope that the day is not all that far off when the borders between body/mind/spirit--matter, thought and will--will no longer be there; that we will soon be able to travel from matter, to mind, to spirit like we can now travel from water, to land, to air and even to moon.
