Tommaso broke the story of possible superluminal nuetrinos now he breaks the first paper I have seen that at least provides consistancy with the result.

(http://www.science20.com/quantum_diaries...tivity_ok-83428)

That would mean the result is a derivative of the MSW effect which we actually discussed so my physics isn't completely destroyed :-)

Whilst it makes me feel happy that if the result is correct (and thats still a big if), I at least understand something of the process that creates the effect.

I like a few of the comments to the article still have a huge problem

>>> How does it avoid energy loss of known electroweak processes (e+ e- emission) <<<

First one to confirm superluminal nuetrinos and solve the energy problem get the Nobel prize :-)

Last edited by Orac; 10/11/11 06:24 AM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.