samwise.......
you're looking at the estimated/predicted temperature increases vs CO2 increases, including feedbacks.
The graph that John presented was the temperature increases (calculated) vs CO2 increases, without feedbacks.
The italics are the critical difference here.
I wasn't looking at any graphs until JMR brought up that one logarithmic graph (which I still think is bogus).
I only included that Royal Soc. graph (found during 'grace-period' check) because it had the same parameters as JMR's graph.I hope to get the back to the CO2 and IR physical properties soon enough, but I need to respond to this graph stuff first, and compose....
~Later
p.s.
For some barely related climate surfings on physical properties of extinction (absorbance) and heating, see:http://www.scienceagogo.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=26584#Post26584
