The theory predicts that the value of the gravitational constant G will vary within any galaxy, and predicts that G will be zero in any intergalactic region of space where no rotation of matter occurs.
What about self-gravitating diffuse gas and dust clouds? Doppler shift measurements show no rotation.
Google
"Great Attractor" 16,000 hits
Let us examine hyper-spinning (e.g., 23-ms pulsar PSR J0737-3039A), hyper-dense (2.3x10^14 g/cm^3) examples,
Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_J0737-3039 http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071 http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-5/index.html http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1473_1.asp Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries
They fly exactly by the book to the limits of experimental uncertainty. Your theory is empirically falsified. The equatorial surface speed of a millisecond pulsar is 0.01-0.1 of lightspeed. The pulsar binary has an orbital period of just 2.4 hrs. Is that fast enough for you? Nothing known is faster.
For a weak-field large-scale rotating system,
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411113 <
http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/pdf/prl83-3585.pdf>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 261101 (2004)
Nordtvedt Effect
Your theory is empirical crap again. For a small scale rotating system, the two pairs of anti-parallel rotating gyroballs in Gravity Probe B. Your theory is empirical crap again.
Up until now everyone has considered it ridiculous to suggest that the inertial motion of matter could generate gravitational forces.
For good reason - observation at scales from grams (Gravity Probe B gyroballs) to 1.4 solar masses (binary pulsars),
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2001-5/ All fly by the book - but not by your book. You cannot support large scale effects without concommittant small scale effects. Where do you draw the line?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html Mathematics of gravitation
Go head, use your "theory" to predict the perihelion precession of Mercury. We'll wait.
When dealing with realistic observations one must always start with a Hertz dipole detector, and then integrate up for a larger receiving antenna.
Arecibo uses a spherical reflector with dipole antenna receiver elements. Arecibo is 305 meters in diameter, the largest curved focusing dish on Earth. Is that large enough? Has Arecibo detected any anomalies vs. expected physics since it was commissioned in 1963, 42 years ago? No.
(BTW, Arecibo located Soviet radar installations by detecting their leakage bouncing back off the Moon.)
