Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Hot Topics

The Environment

Evolution

Space

Mind/Brain

Electronics

Climate Change


Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
The universe as magic roundabout
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Bionics
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2008 News

Rusty's Reading List
Sci Books
Join Rusty Rockets for the lowdown on what you should be reading.
Archives
2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


10 October 2005
Race Is On For Efficient Organic Solar Cells
by Kate Melville

With the cost of fossil fuels rising, attention is once again turning to organic solar cells, which can produce electricity much more cheaply than conventional silicon based solar cells. However, organic polymer solar cells have to date been plagued by low efficiency, typically converting the sun's energy to electricity at levels of around 1 or 2 percent.

But that may be about to change, with two teams of university researchers making announcements last week of improvements to organic cells that yield much better efficiencies. Traditional silicon solar cells yield around 15 to 20 percent efficiency rates. But with silicon cells, costs are prohibitive, largely due to the computer industry's insatiable demand for silicon.

The team from the University of California - Los Angeles (UCLA) is using a single layer of plastic sandwiched between two conductive electrodes. The researchers say that their cell is easy to mass-produce and costs about one-third of traditional silicon solar technology. Independent tests on the UCLA solar cell carried out by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) found an efficiency rate of 4.4 percent.

"As in any research, achieving precise efficiency benchmarks is a critical step," UCLA researcher Yang Yang said. "Particularly in this kind of research, where reported efficiency numbers can vary so widely, we're grateful to the NREL for assisting us in confirming the accuracy of our work." Writing in Nature Materials, Yang predicted that given the strides the team has made with the technology, they will be able to double the efficiency in a very short period of time. The target for polymer solar cell performance is ultimately about 15 to 20 percent efficiency, with a 15 to 20 year lifespan.

Yang says the 4.4 percent efficiency achieved by UCLA is the highest number yet published for plastic solar cells. But that may soon change with reports from researchers at the New Mexico State University (NMSU) and Wake Forest claiming 5.2 percent efficiency rates. The organic cells being developed by this team are made of plastic that is relatively inexpensive, flexible, can be wrapped around structures or even applied like paint.

NMSU physicist Seamus Curran believes a mass market is not far away. "Conventional thinking has been that that landmark [in efficiency] was at least a decade away. This means we are closer to making organic solar cells that are available on the market. With this group's research, it may be only four or five years before plastic solar cells are a reality for consumers."

He added that the importance of the breakthrough cannot be underestimated as a cheap, flexible plastic made of a polymer blend would revolutionize the solar market. "Our expectation is to get beyond 10 percent in the next five years. Our current mix is using polymer and carbon buckyballs [fullerenes] and good engineering from Wake Forest and unique NSOM [near-field scanning optical microscopy] imaging from NMSU to get to that point."

Source: New Mexico State University, University of California - Los Angeles



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.