Quote:
No Paul it implies you have to have absolute space because the answer is totally inconsistent with any form of relativity


perhaps that's why my answer is correct !

obscuring it by making it incorrect in order to "fit it into"
relativity should not be scientific.

but since you don't really do scientific stuff , I can understand why you would believe that correct just will
not work with incorrect so as usual in order for it to
work in relativity you would first need to destroy it
so that it becomes useless in reality.

Quote:
that is what it took around 5-6 pages of posts to get too.


Im not going to fall for that , orac.

I really don't think you know very much about anything , and
mostly what you do is you allow others to provide any content
other than your consistent boasting about how your at a much
higher level of intelligence than they are.

Quote:
I will leave Bill to explain Bill and Rede to explain the problem of absolute space because they are right into GR and after that effort to discuss the most basic science I am worn out.


I can tell your worn out , "bill to explain bill" LOL

but I cant understand why physics would wear you out if you understand it.
I can understand that if your mind has to constantly find work
arounds in order to pacify the fake science , well that could
quickly and easily wear anyone out , and that's the reason why
I don't even take any of the fake science serious , its just to
damaging for the brain.

lets list a few motion/power observations of motion in reality.

the motion of water = water power
the motion of wind = wind power
the motion of light = solar power

now a list of a few motion/power observations of motion using fuels.

burning coal = the motion of wind ( steam )= coal power
burning gas = the motion of wind ( explosion) = gas power

by replacing the word motion with the word energy
in the above there is no change because energy is motion.

every type of power plant that I can think of uses motion
as a means of generating electricity.

energy is motion

no matter how you look at it.

why is it that I can so neatly and correctly define energy
but you cant?

is it that your poisoned brain is keeping you from understanding that energy is motion because it is simply
maintaining a work around to pacify the fake science?

but you haven't given your definition of energy yet , orac.

have you considered that energy is a part of reality
and that is the reason why you cant give a definition of energy
as your brain is rejecting reality in order to pacify the
fake science?




can you explain why reality allows this man to power his home this way using the fake science in your brain?


3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.