I think I will side with the science cult group on this one, hopefully no goats involved in the cult
I wouldn't expect anything else from you , orac
potential energy, chemical energy and electro-magnetic energy don't exist.
you have only listed
forms of energy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy#Forms and these forms of energy do exist.
but they are not energy , they can only be used
to cause motion which is energy.
if energy is not motion then why do all of the energy
and work and power equations used in physics describe
motion?
or do you think that these equations would be better
by simply not using motion to calculate energy?
Energy
E=m
vs
E=m(c^2 motion)
Kinetic Energy
Ke=.5m
vs
Ke = .5m(v^2 motion)
Potential Energy
Pe =m
vs
Pe= m(gh potential motion)
one of the main issues I have with the qmers
is that they simply lack logic.
in your post you asked me to define energy and I have defined energy , and in all of your wisdom you have attempted to refute my definition of energy using forms of energy.
I guess the real difference between real science and
the new modern science cult is that when real science goes
to the bathroom they give a [censored] and then when the new modern science cult goes to the bathroom they actually do take a [censored].
striving for perfection here !!
and thats probably why you and the new modern science cult are so full of [censored]
