being ignorant is of course your choice.
but your being ignorant does not mean that everyone
should follow you and your ignorance.
I suppose you have some type of proof that these people
were not cured by the therapy.
otherwise you are just voicing your ignorant opinion.
perhaps you could explain why this young lady still has
her arm , the same arm that modern medicine wanted to remove
at the shoulder?
because modern medicine did not have any treatment that
would keep her arm intact usable and attached to her body.
if you were not voicing your ignorant opinion then that
means that your opinion was a educated one or your opinion
came from one who has an educated opinion.
either way she still has her arm.
no thanks to modern medicine , the fda , or any of the
organizations or agencies that receive millions each year
to do what the Gerson Therapy accomplished.
And ever since I've been wearing this hat, I have never been attacked by a bear. So it's obviously a bear repellent, and a damn good one. By your logic, I should be advertising it as thus?
I'm not voicing my opinion on the videos, as I cannot view them, nor care to. I'm voicing my opinion on your 'stop the presses' take one example and call it gospel approach.
Wanna buy a bear proof hat?
Also paul, did you know... sometimes cancer actually just goes away? It does indeed happen, so should we adopt a policy of non-action based on those few instances? Where do you draw the line?
