You see, the propagandists, who hate the truth, have been unable to find fault with the arguments against plate tectonics (presented in the first post).
Since they have been unable to counter the arguments with logic, they now try to avoid the questions by the usual methods (changing the topic, discussing some obscure, but irrelevant, point, ad infinitum, etc, etc) and in this way hide the fact that they have no counter arguments of any worth.
That those here at scienceagogo.com have not been able to find fault with these arguments is not surprising. That none of the university people contacted have seen fit to provide a reply, is quite sad. It is true that not all of the 600 were geologists, or physicists, or people who might feel qualified to judge, but many were.
Its all a bit disappointing,... especially the academics,... who are all suddenly pushed for time, when asked for their critique of the arguments (after having had over a year to think about it). Other responses have been,... "Oh yes, I forgot about that (for the 2nd or 3rd time), I'll have to think about it (some more) and get back to you," and "Why don't you go and see what's his name (again), he knows more about this," and the simplistic, and completely wrong, "the atmosphere convects, therefore the mantle convects," etc.
