Quote:
Namely; The impacted area is contained within a circle on the globe (i.e., is circular).

Therefore, the non-impacted area is also within a circle on the globe (i.e., is circular).


Am I the only person on the Forum who does not follow the logic of this statement? If so, would someone please help me out.

I can acknowledge that if the impacted area is circular, and if the non-impacted area is considered as a "fringe" around it; then the non-impacted area could be consideren as a larger circle, but Pangea seems to be equated to the circle of the impact area.

There never was nothing.