The probability of rolling an even number on a standard dice is 0.5. Yet, since it is practically impossible to predict what you'd get on any of the rolls the outcome of the roll is random. If I were to get infinite even numbers, the same rules would apply, the outcome would still be random.
REP: That was an Euclidean remark.When we talk about the Experiment taking place in TIME the intuitive reasoning has its limitation.... There is a samll chance that you may get 2000 consecutive Heads it you perform the Head Tail expermiment sufficient number of times.Interestingly the distrbtuion of these lumps of coincidences follow statistical laws... and thus give the verifier a chance to distinguish bewtween what is RANDOM and what is NOT RANDOM.
Assuming the verification follow some known rules it is easy to say that the experiment can again be simulated creating a false impression of randomness.Becuase the distribution itself is predictive as it is executed by a predictive algorithm.... Hope that is clear...
In short the FUTURE determined by a RANDOM INCIDENT IN A DETERMINISTIC COMPUTING SPACE can be recrearted... thus making the whole excercise a COMPLEX SIMULATION....This is not the case with Qunatum Probability ....IN PRINCIPLE THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF RECREATING THE SERIES USING ANY MEANS OR ANY EXPERMINETAL SETUP...
Hope I am clear.
