TheFallibleFriend,
What I was basically trying to say was that if a set of results were random, it would be impossible to have an anomaly in them. Please correct me if I'm wrong but I think an anomaly in randomness is a set of numbers with a logical pattern to them. If this were the case and a pattern appeared in a set of random results it would not be an anomaly, it would be a coincidence.

You are right, I have not done the least bit of homework on the subject of randomness; but this is only because I had no idea one could do research on randomness. I had assumed that this was general knowledge. Could you please recommend something?

Thank you.