redweneur
if someone has a theory about the stones and there is nothing that would oppose that theory , then the theory would remain intact would it not?
I think the above is the post that was the basis of your reply below.
You can come up with an idea and call it a hypothesis, even without evidence - that doesn't constitute a theory; but you can then set about accumulating evidence to support the hypothesis. If you have a measure of success, then you can call it a theory. It may turn out to be a strong theory or a weak theory depending upon how substantial the evidence. Then again, if you find no evidence at all, then it remains a baseless hypothesis, and does not constitute a theory in the scientific sense.
Then again, if you take the texts of the Bible as evidence because you believe them to have been provided by the Almighty, then why bother discussing science? You can fill the knowledge gap instantly, without recourse to rationality and logic. It has been done for millennia, after all. The only reason that springs to mind for opposing science is that it threatens a precarious and untenable theology.
if the above is concerning what I said about a theory
then what exactly were you trying to put forth?
that you and paragraph comprehension and forum thread following have parted ways?
that you are capable of typing alot of words that have no bearing on the subject?
were you praticing being a encylopedia?
and no I was not offended , why should I be , what I wrote
was correct and in context.
You can fill the knowledge gap instantly
evoloution seem to be the one that fills gaps instantly!
lets see the earth is around 4.5 billions years old
theres a gap of lifelessness and no fossile record from 4.5 billion years ago to 542 million years ago..
quite a gap.
then life just sprang up everywhere on the earth simultaneously.
where is evoloutions [evolving] durring ... DURRING ... the
4 billion year gap?
now you can explain more about how and what science is ...
thats what you and tff do right , never a inteligent reply to a post , nothing but your views on what science is , not the contents of science.
