Samwik,
The "ice cube in a bowl" analogy was hilarious. I was just adding to the humor. How could last years melting of Greenland or the Arctic explain the cooling of the oceans that started in 2003? Time travel? lol.
My opinion…The so called scientists who have been preaching climate catastrophe for the last 40 years should be decertified and put out to pasture. No, they shouldn't start over. They should just give up and let real scientists take over. We might get accurate predictions if we get rid of the politics and the preconceived notions of CO2.
Paul,
What if the water in the bowl was the same temperature as the East and West Greenland Currents? (0°Celsius and colder) Would Greenland’s melting ice water lower, or raise the temperature of the water in the bowl?
Let's use the real world. What would cool the oceans more?
1. A little bit of ice melt runoff into the frigid East and West Greenland Currents during the summer months when the sun is heating the oceans in the northern hemisphere.
2. The hundreds of miles of icebergs and sea ice flowing from the Arctic for the rest of the year, with less solar energy warming the oceans.
(One small hint...Greenland's glaciers give birth to icebergs for about 5 months during the annual iceberg season....and not during the summer melt months.)
Would pressure relief on the magma cool the frozen and frigid East and West Greenland Currents?
It’s best to stick to real world science over fantasy. CT? Where?
Here's the scam...
Pass a law based on pseudoscience to tax Americans $1.2 TRILLION over 20 years.
Claim that GW is real, but will be masked by natural climate forces and we won't see the warming until 2030. (20 years)
They can now tax Americans for 20 years for AGW with a promise that we won't see the warming during the tax timeframe.
In 2030, claim that the taxes worked and we prevented catastrophe.
Another successful "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!" with much more to be made from carbon credits.
Gosh! The exact same people did the exact same thing with CFC's.
