…it is a good idea to learn the mainstream science, if you want to proudly debunk it.
I think that I would then have an investment that I might
need to protect.
but Im glad that you earned your certificate in global
warming physics.
I am wondering if your instructor avoided any type of
discussion that would have been focused on the overall
physics of global warming of the entire recorded
history of the climate or did he focus mainly on the last
few thousand years?
and , did he ever mention volcanic action as being a
cause of greenhouse gasses?
or was he mainly concerned with human intervention as being
a cause of CO2.
because , I have checked the image you posted below against
several long running volcanoes and calderas and I find the years seem to match the CO2 increases in the image below
for the Vesuvius eruptions but your graph seems to stop
at the 6000 year mark , why does the graph stop at the 6000 year
mark?
is this an example of cherry picking data to fill a basket
full of cherries to give to the public?
Vesuvius
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_VesuviusIt was then built up by a series of lava flows, with some smaller explosive eruptions interspersed between them. However, the style of eruption changed around 19,000 years ago to a sequence of large explosive plinian eruptions, of which the 79 AD one was the most recent.
I was going to compare santorini to the graph but the graph stopped before I had the chance!
