what basis in any observation does science have that
causes science to believe that life developed?
There was a time when there was no life. Then there was time when there was primitive single celled life. Over time more complicated life forms developed from the early single celled life forms. The first life forms must have developed from something, so they must have developed from non-living chemicals. This is a simple and easily understood progression.
I notice that you did not provide any basis, even a simple progression, for your belief that life was created. You just waved your hands and said it was impossible for life to have developed without the intervention of Intelligent(?) Design.
As far as being able to create life. We can't do it right now, but just because we can't do something now is no reason to say we will never be able to do it. There was a time when it was know that organic chemicals could only be produced by living organisms. Then we found out we could do it in the laboratory, then in factories. Researchers are constantly finding ways to create more complex chemical forms. Extrapolating the results of current research I figure it is just going to be a matter of time until they figure out how to repeat what nature managed to do within 1 billion years of the formation of the Earth.
Bill Gill
