Mike: "And yet its agreed that the most distant parts of the universe are accelerating ever faster away from us, and from each other. That being true, I am simply reasoning that there is less Mass per cubic parsec, in those distant regions, than here in ours."
- Remember the analogy of the points on the surface of an expanding balloon? They all separate at the same rate. Whichever point you choose, all the others move away - and the relative rate of movement increases with distance. It's a limited analogy, of course, as the galaxies are 'points' in three dimensions not two, but the principle is the same. So the distribution of matter would be the same, whether it be there or here. We don't have a special location on the surface of that balloon.
Mike: "Transporting our best Cesium or Mercury Atom clocks to different parts of our local Universe only confirm Einsteins equations. Is it the transporting (movement) of the clock that has altered the Cesium ticks or is it the slight difference of gravity in its new position? Or both?"
- Both; (relative) movement slows time, but something else to ponder: remember that (relative) velocity also causes an increase in mass, and therefore an increase in gravity!
Mike: "...I am looking forward to the time the Collider at Cern starts spewing out its Data later this year."
- Ditto. We live in exciting times, don't we!
