Originally Posted By: terrytnewzealand
The idea that Darwin should have been able to explain exactly how evolution works is completely stupid, a stupidity that IDers and creationists usually suffer from.


Why am I not surprised that you don't understand that ID and Creationism is entirely distinct? Apart from one denying evolution and the other recognising it. Creationism is solely religious, ID has proponents who are atheist and agnostic.

What is the main argument behind ID? Do you know?