According to you extrasense ... those scientists that are smart and honest are those that agree with you and those, presumably that are moronic and felons disagree. Fair enough.
So we can now conclude that the following should followed up on by the ES police:
http://www.research.ibm.com/quantuminfo/http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-quant.htmlhttp://mitworld.mit.edu/video/411/http://www.qtc.ecs.soton.ac.uk/lecture1/lecture1h.htmlhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7279/19681/00912418.pdf http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-entangle/#1Do you have any idea how ridiculous it looks seeing an unknown anonymous person claiming I know more than IBM, MIT, Stanford University, University of Southampton, IEEE, University of California at Berkeley, etc.
Take a look at this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglementYou expect that we should accept what you write and ignore the facts with respect to Albert Einstein's EPR Paradox? Ignore Bell's Inequality?
When you are capable of explaining why the CHSH (two-channel) experiment is invalid ... do so in a peer reviewed journal, with math, and you may be taken seriously.
Right now you are just saying that you don't understand it, you don't believe it, and thus it can not be right. The universe doesn't work that way.
