Originally Posted By: DA Morgan
Max wrote:
Do you really believe this? Based on what? Certainly not on this:


No, not those sites. Try any of these...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...G=Google+Search

Originally Posted By: DA Morgan
Max wrote:
Do you really believe this? If you do it would seem you are the only person on the planet that does.


Your links seem to agree with me.

Originally Posted By: DA Morgan
Max wrote:
But then why should anyone pay attention to those dolts at NASA, NOAA, CSIRO, and Harvard University when we have an anonymous poster named Max to set us straight.


You mean Soloman and the group? Well, they were wrong about CFC's, and now admit they knew the numbers they used for fear mongering about CO2 were wrong. This means that all of the websites that use info from the 2001 report are wrong. Or, the NASA scientist who admitted to knowingly using high numbers in his Antarctica report? We need to stay away from using links that use data from the 2001 report. The IPCC has admitted the truth. The 2007 report is out, and has much lower numbers.


I like to discuss this topic, but I can't play the link game...too many bogus sites that use info from the 2001 report.

Last edited by Max; 02/19/07 01:22 AM.