Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
Why is our blood red
by janelee
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Unified Field Theory?
by TheodoreToth
Yesterday at 08:41 PM
CFL - tempers in the house of (representatives ? )
by paul
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
a serious question to the forum
by paul
Yesterday at 07:22 PM
The Concept of the Whole and Threadism
by Revlgking
Yesterday at 11:45 AM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
New IPCC climate warning
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Penis enlargement surprise: it's possible
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2009 News

Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets reviews this week's science titles and lists his all-time faves.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


1 August 2007
Girth, Not Length, Makes For Healthy Streams
by Kate Melville

How much excess nitrogen - from fertilizers, animal waste, sewer lines, and highways - reaches waterways appears to be heavily influenced by the width of the vegetated borders around the stream. A new study from the EPA has found that borders of at least 50 meters are required for optimal removal of the human-produced nitrogen byproducts that can contaminate waterways.

The researchers collected data on various buffers along with nitrogen concentration in streams and groundwater to identify trends between nitrogen removal and buffer width, water flow path and vegetation. They found wide buffers (greater than 50 meters) removed more nitrogen than narrow buffers (0-25 meters).

Writing in the Journal of Environmental Quality, the researchers explained that different vegetation types may be an important factor in certain landscapes and hydrologic settings where forested buffers may prevent nitrogen in deep groundwater or contribute more organic carbon in streams. Riparian buffers of herbaceous vegetation or a mix with forest vegetation were found to be effective only when wider.

The study also noted that riparian services provide numerous ecosystem services beyond nitrogen removal, and although buffer width, dimension, and vegetation type provide benefits such as stream shading and water temperature maintenance, fish and wildlife habitat, or sediment control; there may be other buffer characteristics more favorable in removing nitrogen. The researchers caution, however, that watershed nutrient management efforts also must include control and reduction of specific and general sources of nitrogen from atmospheric, land, and water inputs.

Related articles:
Gloomy Prognosis For Amphibians
Road De-Icing Threatens U.S. Aquatic Habitats
Waterways Awash With Anti-Bacterial Chemical

Source: American Society of Agronomy



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.