Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Recent Posts
Philosophy of Religions--all religions, including,
Ellis
Yesterday at 11:30 PM
edge of space; plausible
Mike Kremer
Yesterday at 10:05 AM
Zealotry over Global Warming
ImranCan
Yesterday at 07:07 AM
How Reliable are those climate models?????
Canuck
05/10/08 06:38 PM
Biofuels Starve the Poor
redewenur
05/10/08 08:00 AM
Artic Ice Free by 2013 !!
samwik
05/10/08 01:07 AM
Semantics, Etymology, Syntactics, Etc.
samwik
05/10/08 12:10 AM
Humanzee? Ape Human Cross
Ellis
05/09/08 11:43 PM
The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
Mike Kremer
05/09/08 04:12 PM
Einstein...
xumpman
05/09/08 11:40 AM
Hot Topics

The Environment

Evolution

Space

Mind/Brain

Electronics

Climate Change


Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones Gone Wild
Homo Superior
The Universe As Magic Roundabout
In Space, No One Can Hear You Say "Doh!"
Bow To Your Insect Overlords!
Bionics
Sex And The Schizoid Factor
Delusions And Mental Illness
We Come In Peace – NOT!
Eeew!
Small Penis Syndrome A Big Problem?
Have You Hugged Your Robot Today?
Down On The Farm - Yields, Nutrients And Soil Quality
Cat Parasite Has Global Ambitions
POP Goes The Planet
The Disappearing Male
Missing Link A Tripping Chimp?
Inorganic Dust Formations Alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2008 News

Rusty's Reading List
Sci Books
Join Rusty Rockets for the lowdown on what you should be reading.
Search
Google

Science a GoGo Web
Archives
2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussions
Features


14 August 2003
Cosmic Rays The Biggest Culprit In Global Warming
by Kate Melville

Global warming will not be reduced much by efforts to limit carbon dioxide emission into the atmosphere, say two scientists.

Dr. Nir Shaviv, an astrophysicist from the Racah Institute of Physics of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and Prof. Jan Veiser a geochemist at the University of Ottawa in Canada, say that temperature variations are due more to cosmic forces than to the actions of man.

In a recent article published in GSA Today, the journal of the Geographic Society of America, Shaviv and Veiser tell of their studies illustrating a correlation between past cosmic ray flux - the high-energy particles reaching us from stellar explosions - and long-term climate variability, as recorded by oxygen isotopes trapped in rocks formed by ancient marine fossils. The level of cosmic ray activity reaching the earth and its atmosphere was reconstructed using another isotopic record in meteorites.

The study showed that peak periods of cosmic rays reaching the earth over the past 550 million years coincided with lower global temperatures, apparently due to the way that the cosmic rays promote low-level cloud formation, hence blocking out the sun. No correlation was obtained, however, with the changing amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

The conclusion of the two scientists is that celestial processes seem to be the dominant influence on climate change, and that increased carbon dioxide release, while certainly not beneficial, is only secondary to those forces which are beyond our control.

In practical terms, says Dr. Shaviv, "The operative significance of our research is that a significant reduction of the release of greenhouse gases will not significantly lower the global temperature, since only about a third of the warming over the past century should be attributed to man." Thus, say the scientists, the Kyoto accord of 1997 - which was aimed at tackling the global warming phenomenon through limitations on carbon dioxide - is not the panacea some thought it would be.

Taking the long-range view, Dr. Shaviv and Prof. Veiser believe that fluctuations in cosmic ray emissions account for about 75 percent of climate variation throughout the millennia. They acknowledge that this position pits them against prevailing scientific opinion, which still places a heavy emphasis on the negative role of greenhouse gases.



Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop   |   About
The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.