RicS wrote:
"End of discussion as far as I am concerned."
And then proceeded to write another 123 lines composed of 1360 words. So ... yeah ... obviously.
Too bad not one byte of which was a link to anything refuting the studies I posted.
Why no links to studies refuting the work?
Because there are none.
And just to pile on before leaving this hopeless thread the following was posted today:
Researchers Link Ice Age Climate-change Records To Ocean Salinity
Source:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061006074312.htm You can keep calling these studies names. You can keep writing about them. You what you can not do is point to studies that refute them.
The worst thing about all this ... is that I would be much happer ... and my children and their children would be much happier ... if you were right.
