ImagingGeek said: "As I said before, DrPretto used a formula for kinetic energy which was disproven nearly a century before he published his work."

Contrary to what the Geek says, De Pretto calls the energy, e=mc2, the potential energy of a mass m.

Read it for yourself in http://preearth.net/pdfs/al-kelly-about-de-pretto.pdf

So, contrary to what De Pretto himself says, the Geek claims that he really meant kinetic energy, even though it is clear, from context, that he means potential energy and that he actually calls e=mc2, potential energy.

I would be interested to hear if there is any basis (at all) for the Geek making this quite weird claim, of his,...

.... or is this just another case of the Geek making up stuff out of thin air,....

Earth formed from a collision
www.preearth.net

Plate-tectonics is wrong
www.preearth.net/plate.html