Originally Posted By: socratus
Originally Posted By: Ellis
Socratus wrote:
'Somebody answerd:
Religion expects science to understand the facts about religion.'

a) Why would that be necessary?

b) Which religion?

c) Are there any in fact any facts in 'religion'?

============================================================
d_r_siva wrote:
Visit anthropology department of a university nearest to you
and ask if they have found an ethnic tribe in any inaccessible
land which did not have a religion.

Religion expects science to understand the facts about religion.
/ d_r_siva /

But somebody wrote .
They have in the South American Piraha tribe.
The tribe has never had any religion and has no concept of spirits,
gods or anything that remotely approaches one. Not that it matters,
their being religion everywhere means only that man is a social
and itinerant species, not that religion is put their by God.
The only thing that this tribe itself proves is that religion does not
have to be present particularly if a language is isolated,
and nothing more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZJ53hn7 ... re=related

So, I don’t know what to think now ?
==


Maybe the anthropology isn’t enough good proof for
God’s existence.
Then the Physics ( in my opinion) will help me to understand
the proof of Religion’s essence.
Why ?
Because if God exists, He must work in an Absolute
Reference Frame and have a set of Physical and Mathematical
laws to create everything.
And if we find this God’s Absolute House
when we can understand Cod’s Physical Laws.

But of course, now there is a strong tradition ( scientific and
religious) that insists that any time we say we know who God is,
or what God wants, we are committing an act of heresy.

Nobody likes heretical ideas (in the beginning of course).
======== .