This is a futile "discussion".

According to Wittgenstein, "discussion" involves "language games" where the participants agree to mutual semantic contexts. The context of "science" mostly involves empiricism and cauasality, whereas that of religion mostly involves idealism and teleology. Those who attempt to marry the two might as well try to play tennis with a football,irrespective of the fact that both games are about trying to make sense of what we call "reality".