FF, on what basis does it make good sense, not to mention good science, for Dawkins to make all religion The arch enemy of humanity, and science the only hope for its salvation?

Was the Roman Catholic monk and scientist, Gregoire Mendel, the founder of genetics, an arch enemy of humanity?

Copernicus was a monk. Galileo, was persecuted by certain narrow-minded religionists, but he remained a loyal Christian because he realized that there were many who supported his findings?

How about Dr. Albert Schweitzer--an enemy of humanity?
Of course there has been conflict,
but there has also been otherwise as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_between_religion_and_science
points out.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/sci_rel.htm
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-science/