Ok DA Morgan. If someone is offering an alternative view (well documented) they would evaluate it on its merits. They would not cloud their judgement by trying to discredit the person. They would say thankyou and evaluate the date on its merits without prejudice. If they found the data to have flaws they would point them out in a straight forward manner. they would concentrate on the data and the issue not the person or their standing in society.

Barry N Depledge