Somebody wrote : 1-D is simpler than 2-D.

The answer.

The 1-D figure is explained by "theory of string-particle".

The result is written in the book "The trouble with Physics" by Lee Smolin.

#

Other wrote: a triangle is simpler than circle.

The answer.

The triangle has angles.

To create angles needs some kind of forces.

Without forces every flat geometrical figure would change into circle.

==..

More details.

Somebody wrote : 1-D is simpler than 2-D.

The answer.

The 1-D ( line with Planck's length but without thickness) is explained

by "theory of string-particle". Theorists try to understand 1-D string in 11-D.

The result is written in the book "The trouble with Physics" by Lee Smolin.

In the others words:

Where is Alice?

Alice is in the 1-D String, at 11-D Wonderland.

#

Other wrote: a triangle is simpler than circle.

The argument.

To make a triangle is needed to apply force at three different locations.

To make a circle is needed to apply force at all locations.

Therefore " a triangle is simpler than circle."

The refutation.

To apply " force at all locations " means that the particle

is in an equilibrium state . . . . in relax state . . . in potential state.

The equilibrium is primary state of particle.

To change equilibrium needs forces.

For example:

To create line needs forces in two different directions.

To create triangle needs forces in three different directions. . . . etc

Without forces every flat particle will change into a symmetrical

equilibrium - circle state: c/d=pi=3,14 . . . .

==….