Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 628 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
M
mikke Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
M
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
We have come from the light, the place where the light came into being of itself.

lite version 22 Sep 2014
site:newcanadiansvideo.com
Summary: On the base of classical physics acquisition of electron, neutron, proton, masses has been proved and calculated . Electron structure as charged sphere under rotation has been proposed. Torus consistent structure of Physical vacuum has been proposed. On the base of proposed vacuum structure Planck constant has been calculated in two ways. Proton radius has been calculated. The classical expression for the de Broglie wavelength of an electron has been obtained.


At the beginning there was nothing. Nothing but the physical Vacuum. Physical Vacuum consists of immobile particles adjacent to each other. It's like sand in the desert. Each grain has the form of a torus. I called it heavy photon.
Each torus is electrically neutral, but contains elementary charges of opposite signs. These elementary charges are grouped in pairs. A pair looks like dumbbell with two opposite charges on it's ends. All dumbbells rotate about the center of the dumbbell and they do not interfere with each other during rotation. How to imagine these rotating dumbbells?
If you cut bagel before buttered, and put on it a few round slices of salami, so they do not overlap each other, but no vacant space left, you will understand what I mean. Each dumbbell under rotation sweeps an area equal to the area of salami slice. Although the positive and negative charges in the dumbbell are in rotation the magnetic energy of the dumbbell is zero. (There is no current). Dumbbell exists due to the balance of rotation and electrostatics energy, which are equal if we took elementary charge as electron charge, if we took distance between charges as classical electron radius, r.
Then total dumbbell energy is 1MeV , or 2*m*c*c where m is electron rest mass, c is the speed of light.

Although all the heavy photons are in rest, as all space is filled with them, heavy photons can transfer rotation from one point in space to another. This transfer you can see as light. Why am I so sure?
Imagine that one billiard ball collides centrally on the other, which was in rest before. Incoming ball stops, ball in rest begins to move. Energy is transferred in space.
Let slightly complicate the task. Let the incoming ball moves at speed V+delta , and let the ball, which was at rest to move in the same direction with a less speed V. Collision is still center. Balls exchange their speed. What is the transfer of kinetics energy? It is

(mV+delta)(mV+delta)/2-m*V*m*V*/2= m*V*delta = k*delta, where k is constant

If all the balls have the same mass, and the same speed V (except one incident ball) In such an analysis, k is a linear momentum (m*V).
When tori transfer rotation energy in space constant k will be some angular momentum, and delta will be linear frequency. In the proposed geometry (see last full version) k value proved to be Planck constant. This means light is transfer of rotational energy for tori .

Now consider the linear chain of 3 tor. First torus has excess rotational momentum in a clockwise direction, the third torus has opposite rotation momentum. Two oppositely directed torques try to break the second torus. If their total energy is greater than the binding energy of the dumbbell(1MeV) , then one of the dumbbells will be broken.
How big must be energy, to do this? The wavelength which is correspond to the energy must exactly equal the big torus circumference λc. In energy equivalence there are two photons having m*c*c (0.5MeV) energy each.
Well when you screw cap with the bank, you have to grab it with your fingers of one hand along the entire circumference and you have to grab with you fingers of other hand along the bottom bank circumference.
Corresponds of photon energy to λc is crucial moment. Imagine you use just two fingers, not five, so wavelength correspond to different from 0.5MeV photon energy. You can't open bank if screw cap is tight.

That is, two energetic photon breaking down one of the dumbbells, carried away two elementary charges, but it is now the electron and positron. Why?
Because they carry away not the only elementary charges, they carry away their "rotation". "rotation" of charge is current. In dumbbell there is no total current because electron compensates positron . So, before energy was in rotation form. Now it is magnetic energy.
So the electron (positron) came to existence as charged rotating sphere.

Photon accepted charge and torque in one time. Charge and torque can't exist separate never more. It's mass.

Actually, Charged sphere must be broken by the force of repulsion, and the only current due to sphere rotation pulls the sphere to the central point.
So just borne electron (positron) has rest energy m*c*c, (sum of electrostatic energy of charged sphere and current magnetic energy. Last value is double mechanical rotation energy of sphere in the same time . Kinetic energy (took from photon) is m*c*c also. So it's looks like it is hoop. Let’s check it. When hoop is rolling it must be correlation between linear frequency c/λc and double kinetic energy:

m*c*c = k*c/λc

It proved to be k is Planck constant. It is second definition of Planck constant.
But hoop total energy must be mcc in regular case. Why it's double big? Because it's charged hoop. I call it: charged hoop must drug its field. That is why I tell "double kinetic mechanical energy" every time.

Electron can reduce it's speed to from c to v, but electron always moves in a circle of radius λd/2π due conservation of angular momentum, which was m*c*λc. That is why electron wavelength must be λd =c* λc/v=h/m*v. Electron can be anywhere in the space along its wavelength λd, as Prince de Broglie has predicted 100 years ago, but now you know where de Broglie wavelength came from.

What is the mass of heavy photon?
It's depends of how many dumbbells match big torus circumference. There are λc/r, where r is dumbbell length (classical electron radius r). Mass of every dumbbell is 2*m. But inside torus every mass is "heavier" by 13/12 factor due to torus binding energy with neighbours. λc was measured already. It is Compton wave length for electron. Value of r is known. So mass of heavy photon is proved to be 1862*m.

Heavy photon can lose some number of dumbbells, due to above predicted mechanism. Let heavy photon to lose 12 dumbbells. I think it is neutron. The axis of rotation are able to precess under the influence of neighboring dumbbells. It's like a worn engine, with loose gear, sooner or later some of them get broken.
So one of the dumbbells get broken, the electron rolls out to carry energy 2*m*c (kinetic and rest mass) and angular
and linear momentums. Acquired linear momentum neutron does not feel because it's very heavy. But the acquisition of angular momentum leads to dramatic consequence. Neutron curls and now it is a proton (1836*m) . That is why the rest mass of the neutron bigger the rest mass of a proton by 2*m*13/12 electron masses.
Proton radius rp one can calculate from law conservation of angular momentum just before neutron decay

Mp*c*rp= (2*m*13/12)*c*λc/2π

where M is proton mass rp ~ r/6, which is correspond with recent data.

So how the Universe come to existence?
God just opened the tap and let light with average energy 0.5MeV to come in. Corresponding thermodynamic temperature is 10 in power 12К. It is Big Bang temperature.

.
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 3
J
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 3
By Alex Galbraith , The Space Reporter | December 09, 2014

According to researchers, a gamma-ray burst very well may have caused a mass extinction over the course of the Earth’s history.

The name “gamma ray burst” sounds like something out of a comic book and the reality isn’t far off. These bursts are the most powerful explosions in the known universe, sending out a blast that is equivalent to all of the energy produced by the Sun in its 10 billion year lifetime. The only difference is the bursts do it over the span of a few minutes at most.

Gamma ray bursts are thought to be caused by an explosion of an extremely large star (called a “hypernova”) or the collision of two ultra-dense neutron stars. The hypernovas produce longer gamma ray bursts that go on for longer than two seconds. Neutron star collision causes the shorter bursts.

No gamma ray burst pointed at the Earth could fully penetrate the Earth’s atmosphere, but it would wreak havoc on the ozone layer and lead to a mass extinction. Long gamma ray bursts typically only happen in dwarf galaxies with sparse amounts of heavy elements, however, there are areas of the Milky Way that could spawn a burst.

Researchers at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem found that the likelihood of an extinction event on Earth triggered by gamma ray bursts was 50 percent in the past 500 million years, 60 percent in the past 1 billion years and more than 90 percent in the past 5 billion years.

The solar system is only around 4.6 billion years old, so it is very likely that the Earth was hit by a gamma ray burst at some point in its history. The researchers suggested that a burst may be responsible for one of the “Big 5″ extinction events.

The researchers went on to say that these bursts may help explain away a concept known as the Fermi Paradox, which questions why we haven’t found advanced civilizations in space considering the high probability that it exists. By the researchers estimates, life like the kind found on our planet can only safely develop in 10 percent of galaxies.

Other, more crowded galaxies would produce more regular gamma ray bursts, thereby increasing the likelihood of a developing planet getting blasted. And researchers add that any planets that harbor advanced civilizations could have only begun around 5 billion years ago. Before that, galaxies were too compact for a life-harboring planet to avoid blasts.

“This may be an explanation, or at least a partial one, to what is called the Fermi paradox or the ‘Big Silence,'” said lead study author Tsvi Piran. “Why we haven’t encountered advanced civilizations so far? The Milky Way galaxy is much older than the solar system and there was ample time and ample space — the number of planetary systems with conditions similar to Earth is huge — for life to develop elsewhere in the galaxy. So why we haven’t encountered advanced civilizations so far?”

http://thespacereporter.com/2014/12/gamma-ray-burst-may-have-caused-mass-extinction-on-earth/
http://www.scienceclarified.com/Mu-Oi/Neutron.html
http://www.livescience.com/49040-gamma-ray-burst-mass-extinction.html


Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.
Wernher von Braun
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
Electron = very small and very fast ball !!!





HUGE PROBLEM FOR PHYSICS ( SYMETRY )





[video:youtube]http://youtu.be/wBY3Z4F0dxk[/video]







GRAVITATION it is not ACCELERATION !


Last edited by newton; 12/15/14 07:34 AM.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
B
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
Mike, I’ve not read all of your post yet; time is short and I found so many questions in the first few lines I thought I would see if I could get a few of those sorted out first.

Quote:
At the beginning there was nothing.


At the beginning of what?

Quote:
Nothing but the physical Vacuum.


This seems to contradict the first statement. Was there nothing, or was there the physical vacuum?

Quote:
Physical Vacuum consists of immobile particles adjacent to each other.


You have some evidence to back this up?

Wouldn't QM have something to say about the immobility?

Quote:
Each grain has the form of a torus.


Why a torus?

Quote:
I called it heavy photon.


First we had nothing, then the physical vacuum; now we seem to have some sort of light – with mass???


There never was nothing.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5