Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Physics Forum axiverse?

Well every now and again an interesting paper arrives out of the blue.

This one has got a few talking the background is covered well enough by both articles so I will leave it at that.

Layman version:
http://phys.org/news/2013-12-mathematical-scientist-axions.html

More Technical:
http://motls.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/dark-matter-011-mev-axion-discovered-in.html


This will be one of those beyond standard model ideas to keep an eye on.

Dear Orac above tests are future

exist huge problem distance to dark matter is very far


earth ----> motion ............ dark matter mass M ---->close C


to prove what is it dark mattery we need do more simply test
( camera ----vacuum L distance ----bulb >>>motion

we must confirm if >>> motion is very fast camera will register more brightness picture IF Motion has got opposite arrow

motion <<< camera ----vacuum L distance ----bulb

camera will register lower intensity signal ( lower brightness)



I made test in home below I showing You graph very important graph if speed is very fast ( faster than C ) front sensor will never register light = for front sesor bulb = dark mattery !!!

Not so far, perhaps.

“Ben Harris, a telecommunications and GPS satellite expert with the University of Texas has made a surprising announcement during his presentation at this year's gathering for the American Geophysical Union. He reported that using GPS data to calculate the mass of the Earth, gives a slightly bigger number than is accepted by the International Astronomical Union. The difference, he suggests, may be due to a disc of dark matter that exists over the equator.”

http://phys.org/news/2014-01-telecommunications-expert-earth-dark-disc.html#jCp

Who needs dark matter, anyway?

"For one thing, current theory suggests the existence of a lightweight particle called the axion, needed to explain an anomaly in the equations of the standard model of particles and forces. If it exists, the axion could make up the mysterious “dark matter” that astronomers say affects the motions of galaxies. But two decades of searching has failed to find proof that axions exist. Two-time physics removes the original anomaly without the need for an axion, Bars has shown, possibly explaining why it has not been found."

http://phys.org/news98468776.html#jCp

DARK MATTERY = 60- 70 % mass of the universe


I need this mass - and physics also ...

before we start speak about universe we must stop block our imagination
by old theories . Very important is gravitation !!!!

but mass M can go faster than own gravitation signal
similar like airplane can escape from own sound

very important is each small mass in the universe even people mass m


step by step we will find true
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20140005165728.shtml


below blog explain other tests and experiments

http://old-physics.blogspot.de/

Turn on Your imagination . Turn on flashlight

flashlight ----->V > C ...............observer I see black holes

M ------>> motion V>G ................observer

observer not see mass M but feel gravitation from past ( apparent mass M position )


below blog explain other tests and experiments

http://old-physics.blogspot.de/

M ------>> motion V>G ................observer

observer not see mass M but feel gravitation from past ( apparent mass M position )


below blog explain other tests and experiments

http://old-physics.blogspot.de/

Newton, your posting seems to prove little apart, perhaps, from the idea that you may be trying to surpass D A Mogan’s posting rate of 4136 posts in under three years.

Perhaps you should try answering some questions instead of just posting repeats of the same assertions.

What, for example, does:



actually mean.

I am willing to accept that it may be my own ignorance that prevents me from understanding; but your ability to explain your ideas to non-experts must be seen as a measure of your own understanding of those ideas.

mass M is moving in space

Respect To what ?


p1...p2....p3...p4.....M ------> motion


motion = constant Velocity ( p1-p2 = p3-4)

or motion = constant acelleration

p1..............p2...........................p3...M ------>



How look wave ( gravitation waves in space )

please imagine 3d Electro - Magnetic wave

each p1...p2...p3 = center ( below drawing )




what is very important for above model ?

Inverted square Law



intensity of the signal is going down if distance rise up


not exist C+V

c- light in vacuum
V- mass M velocity





very good example in real life

Solar system

earth -----SUN ------------------earth

above drawing is ok or below ?


earth-------SUN--------earth >>>>motion


????

SUN STARTED WAVE 8 minutes ago ????

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yrD2uFLkznM/Ua6hkakJkII/AAAAAAAAA80/9O4Y-yFYbsY/s1600/222.JPG

Why we have winter and SUMMER ? Intensity of the signal is important ? we are moving or not ?

below picture is not my own I copied

two last pictures are very good



THE WINER IS ....

MR MACH and MR MAROSZ ....



WHY MR MAROSZ ( mach would like to use far far star - apparent position please read he spoke with Einstein before GRT )

MAROSZ I already made in home my own STAR !!!
CAMERA SEE APPARENT POSITION of the bulb !!!



why camera see different brightness of picture
why ???

camera ---- bulb ---- camera >>>>30 km/s ????good reason

remeber aberration 1730 J bradley and Inverted square Law
and not exist C+ 30 km/s and MR ORAC's idea( thnk you )
air = different resisatnce for light

light >>> air >>> camera >>>

camera >> air >>> <<<light

:):)

WHO IS WINER ? ( I'm only 33 years old !!! )

I LIVE MY BRAIN WORKING



more You can finde in forum

http://old-physics.blogspot.de/

good night or good morning ?