Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use. So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.
I made 8 x slower movie to check if light will disapear at one time or I will be able see effect similar like sun goinng slowly down ( brightness step by step going down step by step not all !!! line disapear at one time)
motion cooperate with ( horizonal laser position ) in test I see motion ( rotation + line = screw )
8 x lover tempo movie !!! ( why line not apear at one time but slowly point by point long rise ) why line not disapear at one time but slowly point by point line is shorter )
WHO CAN EXPLIN ME WHY SMALL DOTHS ARE MOVING ? motion / I have evidence that we can use laser to evaluate motion
everyone can do this what I in home !!!
My laser cost 200 Euro !!! ( I invested my last money for this test )
I wait here for Universities someone need help me finish this what I plan to do . I dream build a team we will be very close many new facts .....!!!!
Lets see if you are smarter than a high school student.
I promise you the universities will get a good laugh if you post that up for them because it takes stupid to a whole new level. I haven't laughed so hard in a long time ... sometimes your thought process is like watching a train wreck in slow motion.
I have decided you really are a troll no one is that stupid.
Last edited by Orac; 11/20/1302:34 PM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Please take mirror to Your hand 1 please move flashlight more closer to wall 2 please move flashlight more closer to mirror
Ask Your self why when You are moving hand ( more close ) - more far mirror not work similar like wall ( inverted sguare law problem)
Michelson Morley 10 m long ARM ( You can move only 2-7 cm )
Ignorant 2 You never study my first test brightness ( camera ---- bulb ) You not understnd why I made Youtube 8 x slower
Ignorant 3 You not understand my new test ( what mean motion for beam on the wall )
I can rotate 90 degree the same laser and I will not see the same problem like for vertical direction ?
ABOUT YOUR LINK Earth motion work on many directions Laser mistake = constant one direction Earth montion is in any tool that you right now using Each test that You saw in past must be repeated constant motion efect must be described
JAMES BRADLEY ABERRATION !!! NOT RELATIVISTIC VERION BUT ORYGINAL AS AUTHOR THINK VERSION !!!
Oh You Are 4 x ingnorant
do you remeber Your picture
it is funy You showed me very important picture but you can not read ? What is moving electon or microscope with lab ?
BR
Exist other option Nobody before Orac recognize that michelson morley problem we can solve by one ORAC's link
Dropkick stupid takes on a whole new meaning with you ... please do race off and publish your result on every physics and university site you can find I want everyone to know how clever you are
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
ignorant no 2 If exist light speed C for any observer any acceleration observer any moving observer
SO LIGHT SHOUD BE or not BE on wall ( zero / one ) iside my laser I have 60 degree prizm
line rise or line step by step disapear
Ignorant no 3 Maciej Marosz = first person who started one year ago very important test / tests I NOT USING MY THEORY and I NOT REPRESENT CLASSICAL MECHANIC IDEA .
Doppler 1842 , Aberration 1730 , 1930 Tolman's brightness test Inverted Square Law ( old greece camera obscura )
Ignorant no 4 Atomic clock works different during motion
but different time of work it is not any relatyvistic efect ( electron has got mass constant motion can change way - how big ellipse will make the same small electron with the same speed it is not relativity only other forces work on electron !!!
is not any relatyvistic efect ( electron has got mass constant motion can change way - how big ellipse will make the same small electron it is not relativity !!!
To search for this asymmetry, scientists spin electrons to test whether they are round or oblong. Whereas a billiards ball will spin smoothly, an egg will wobble. The same goes for an electron with an electric dipole moment.
ANSWER: The electron appears to be spherical to within 0.00000000000000000000000000001 centimeter
Your motion bullshit means nothing to an electron it remains spherical even when picked up and accelerated to 99.99% light speed in a particle accelerator.
Yeah that fact caught even professional scientists off guard they expected it to distort ... QM plays by it's own rules it cares little for motion.
Now please I am done with you and your bullshit ... I will not be talking to you again.
Last edited by Orac; 11/20/1303:35 PM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
After today I know one ( Michelson Morley and two mirrors = mistake ) I tried solve problem why they have ZERO why they get for this zero NOBLE it is 100 different problem !!
about Your links we need study problem and use own brain not links as I told You please take flaslight and please confirm why mirror is flat ? Iverted Sguare Law and 10 meters loong ARM can give them zero with huge precision !!!
in my test exist medium problem we need confirm in vacuum
Next our brain and central nervous system are tuned to this frequency range as evidenced by the medically established EEG brain state frequencies from low delta to high Beta.
your an inventor , invent a laser that fills the room with natural frequencies that can help heal people.
there's loads of money in it.
something that can accompany a video perhaps.
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
10 points to Paul .. it looks to me like one of the diffraction grating or piezo type line generators to me but same effect and same result.
The line is actually not a line at all but a series of dot being deflected in a pattern ... its the cheapest and easiest way to make this device and works the same as your surveyors device.
Not really hard to work out was it
Last edited by Orac; 11/20/1303:55 PM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
so if your laser is not rotating at exactly 24 rps or any multiple of 24 such as 48 , 96 , 192 , etc then the camera will pick up motion... if it is rotating at 24 , 48 , 96 etc you should not see movement.
this is why you see movement.
<--during 1st second--->
1st frame
|.......................
2nd frame
.|......................
3rd frame
..|.....................
the light is out of sync with the camera.
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
They discuss your problem you think is cool and even give it a name "laser speckle" look at page 3 on the PDF.
They tell you how to avoid laser speckle
Quote:
As a diffuse reflective and thus an optically rough-textured surface is essential for the utilization of the laser light section method, laser speckling is not to be avoided in principle.
A mirror is the exact opposite of what you need to avoid laser speckle from these generators and that is why you have such bad speckling.
Last edited by Orac; 11/20/1304:34 PM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
The mirror like anything on earth is slightly vibrating so of coarse the speckle pattern moves.
Do the obvious just flick the side of the mirror gently or even get a feather duster and just tap very gently on the side of the mirror and watch what happens.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Yes get some sleep but yes vibrations is what you are seeing and yep you have worked it out.
Mirrors are notorious for that problem if all you are trying to do is change the direction on the beam 2 x90 degree beam prisms will do it without the vibration problem for less than $20 each.
These problems are why I say to you be harder on yourself and your experiment.
When you think ... you understand ... but there is this other crazy Marosz who just jumps in and assumes things because that crazy Marosz only sees the answer he wants to see.
You are like jekyll and hyde
Last edited by Orac; 11/20/1304:54 PM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.