To provide all the information that one could get from the article would infringe copyright.
the below is from the web site you linked to.
it seems that there would be no copyright infringement
if the submitter submitted work to the web site.
so you should be covered by the terms of use on the web site,
By submitting work to this website, the submitter agrees to grant a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, modify and perform the user submission in connection with the website owner’s business in any media formats now known and hereafter developed and through any media channels. All rights in this paragraph are granted without the need for additional compensation of any sort to the submitter.
if the article is linked from another website that holds
a copyright notice then that might be construed as copyright infringement , but only in that case.
given that the article belongs to the submitter that is.
Or you could ignore it, but not everyone might want to make that choice. Why deprive others of something, just because you have a gripe about it?
I could ignore it and I am ignoring it.
plus , its not important that I have a gripe about it or not , whats important is that the web site requires you to register with a e-mail address I presume , and registering with web sites leads to spam in your inbox.
why else would the web site require one to register to simply
view the articles contained on the website?
there must be some type of advertising somewhere in
the mix.