How does your theory explain
superposition (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition) => The ability for matter to be oscilating between two places at one time
Delay choice erasure (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed_choice_experiment) => How am I able to change light a billion years old
The list goes on and on ... your finite world doesn't allow such things.
In fact, many of these observations are not direct 'predictions' of QM
Absolute rubbish they were a thought experiment, read the reference, which only later became testable.
That alone shows your understanding of the current state of QM the only accidental observations where duality etc around the 19th century almost all new discoveries come from prediction.
BEC (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose-Einstein_condensate)
=> This state of matter was first predicted by Satyendra Nath Bose and Albert Einstein in 1924–25.
=>Seventy years later, the first gaseous condensate was produced by Eric Cornell and Carl Wieman in 1995
Only took 70 years to be able to test it but it was accidental was it, or do you deny the observation?
At the end of the day you hang your hat on
There can also be other explanations, which may come up in future
You know the religious groups do the same thing
The dinosaur fossils can't be real the bible says so, there can also be other explanations, which may come up in future
We have a name for that it's called denialist ... I am sorry I rate the denial of QM alongside denial of fossils.
Perhaps you would care to look at the history of QM observations you are up against (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_quantum_mechanics)