Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Physics Forum GAMMA RAY BURSTS (GRBs) explained by new paradigm

GAMMA RAY BURSTS (GRBs) explained by new paradigm black hole splitting.
Two approaching equal sized black holes are supposed not to split but originate a Herbig Haro object, often found inside star forming nebula.
However we found multiple examples, e.g. inside the EAGLE NEBULA of traces of “splitting black holes”.

I suggest that such a splitting process should be triggered by the collision of two unequal sized black holes. The smaller black hole is supposed to be able to split the larger black hole by its concentrated imprisoned electron jet and local vacuum deformation.
The result however is that the splitting process unleashes a BURST of electrons in-between the parts of the splitted black hole which can be described as a CATAPULT ejection.
As a consequence however, this Gamma ray Burst ejection should be “one sided” in stead of the two-sided ejection suggested by mainstream astronomy.
At the same time this seems a rational base for the fact that Gamma Ray bursts are so rare and able to travel well focussed over long (cosmological) distances.
For more details see this blog and:
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/08/new-book.html
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

Leo Vuyk.

Why two massive objects should be supposed to split instead of merge?

Good question:

A new Black hole paradigm, that BHs create a small globular Fermion repulsive horizon by the fermion spin flip.
consequence: ionized gas bubbles are glued to BHs and the mutual push of two electron jets between them (see also Herbig Haro objects with two BHs .
see also how the double LeSage gravity around a black hole influeces the spin flip into a repulsion horizon.:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Ss...N+principle.jpg

OK, so once again:

Why two massive objects should be supposed to split instead of merge?

Are you oposing your theory by another theory of yours - or how we can understand the sentence:

..two approaching equal sized black holes are supposed not to split but originate a Herbig Haro object..

Who ever considered first option?

Black holes are supposed not to merge due to the constant repelling electron jet in combination with the ionized gas bar between them.
however if we interprete the big bang as the evaporation process of one compact huge black hole into a bush of black hole splinters called the lyman alpha forest, and GRBs are representing the splitting process into more smaller black holes, then a CYCLIC universe is hard to understand.
So at the end of the road there should be indeed a merging proces that merges alls those smaller black holes into one huge big Crunch black hole again!!

So yes you have a point which should be investigated
Leo.

When holes are black, they've no electrons jet.

It is all about what you can observe in space: examples of the new BH paradigm, such as Herbig Haro systems, often connected to "Gas pillars"in star forming nebula etc.
Look at a good large scale example of the new paradigm: Cygnus A galaxy Qso equipped with two BHs at each end of the electron jet.
So every BH binary system should have such jets.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Ss...A+principle.jpg

New Black Hole Paradigm?

It is assumed that as an extension for mainstream cosmology, Black Holes should
be equipped with an extra small Fermion-repulsive globular horizon called:
"Higgs-repulsion horizon" which is only repulsing Fermions and not bosons or the
Higgs system.
As a consequence, Black Holes don't swallow matter, but only photons and the
vacuum Higgs lattice itself, which is assumed to be the logical origin of the
Hubble red shift and a pulsating model for the universe.
As a second consequence, Black holes should have a central nucleus made up by
real Higgs particles which are fiercely compressed by the incoming oscillating
Higgs vacuum lattice.
A third consequence is, that Black Holes are able to be propelled by gas tails
and migrate to a hierarchical position inside the local Dark Matter Halo of main
Galaxies and even migrate inside the much smaller hierarchy of Nebula and Dwarf
Galaxy Black Holes.
The most distant and massive Galaxy Black Holes are supposed to be left over
from the (alternative) Big Bang process, which is interpreted as an evaporating
primordial (Big Crunch) Black Hole.
These massive Black Holes are coined: "Galaxy Anchor Black Holes" or short:
GABHs,
GABHs are interpreted as the origin of the distribution of density waves (arms)
inside Galaxies, with so called "white holes" as gas concentration (compression)
centres in between as is depicted in my book (The new God particle and Free
will).
Our Milky Way seems to have a 5-arm density wave structure, (Andromeda= 2 arms),
so related to the system, it seems the best bet, to assume that the Milky Way is
equipped with a 4 or 5- GABH black Hole system, to explain the 5-armed
density-waves. According to this system, Andromeda should be quipped with at
minimum three GABHs.
Smaller scale Black Holes scattered around inside the Halo of the Milky Way, are
supposed to be Super Nova Black Holes (SNBHs) produced by Supernova explosions
during the evolution of the Galaxy.
As a consequence, we may assume that the largest SNBH black holes are the
remnants of the first super heavy stars inside the Milky Way.
Thus these SNBH Black Holes have different ages and different masses, the
largest black holes are supposed to be the origin of most DWARF Galaxies.
SNBHs could be interpreted as "scaled down copies "of the original GABHs Galaxy
system, which means that in the gravitational centre of two or more SNBHs there
is reason to expect also a White Hole gas compression location, to form
Irregular and not Globular Dwarf Galaxies.
Star formation inside irregular Dwarfs, is a second evident correlation with the
white hole location inside main Galaxies.
It is assumed that there is a Black Hole hierarchy around main Galaxies: the
most massive Black Holes are located far away from the Galaxy (like the GABHs)
and the smallest Black Holes are located near the nucleus of the Galaxy (with
some exceptions for elliptical and Galaxies) .
This system is assumed to have only small rotational abilities to pick up stars
from the main Galaxy (like Globular clusters seem to have done ) , so the
question arises: HOW DID GLOBULAR DWARFS PICK UP (often old) STELLAR CONTENT?
It seems to be a logical step to assume that disruption of "close encounter"
Dwarf Galaxies seems to be the origin of distant Globular Dwarf Galaxies.
Extra families of black holes are supposed to exist which are not created inside
Super Nova explosions (SNBHs), but on SUNSPOT remnants and on Comets, Mini
Comets and Ball lightning. See: "Splitting and pairing black holes" in the
references.

The violation of the second law.

If we are able to find a solution for such a violation, then this is a sign of new physics and at the same time a possibility to describe unexplained energized x-ray point sources, such as all Quasar Hotspots, Sunspots, Herbig Haro Hotspots, Comets, Sunspots, and even Ball Lightning.
If we look at the Carina Nebula, we may become a strong suspicion for acceleration phenomena, by recognizing pairing Black holes as the base for new Herbig Haro objects which are known as the origin of newly formed open star clusters.
However we need to find the mechanism behind these pairing Black holes which leads us to a new interpretation of physics.
After a long journey of research for this book, it came out that an extended model based on the non-relativistic “Bohm- Bell particle interpretation” of Quantum mechanics with additional real particle shapes, could do the job and explain most of the present anomalies in physics which are found on the macro and micro scale!
The Bohm-Bell interpretation is described in Bell’s book: “Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum mechanics” (Cambridge universal press, 1987) and recently discussed and supported in articles such as: “John Bell and Bell’s Theorem” (2004) by D. Dürr, S. Goldstein at all.
It was David Bohm and John Bell and others, like Jean Pierre Vigier and Basil Hiley, who tried to get an alternative picture and a more ontological sound proposal for physical reality.
They assumed that all particles should be real point-particles accompanied by a so called wave function but without a physical extension
However they failed to propose experimental differences with the standard theory to get a broad support from the physics community and the mathematical changes they proposed where not seen by the mainstream as a better alternative. This is described by Paul Davies and John Brown in “The Ghost in the Atom” described later in this book.
In contrast with the Bohm-Bell interpretation, we propose in this book, that the Higgs vacuum is a dense network or lattice occupied by fast oscillating FORM changing Higgs particles and that Fermions are not “point particles” but real spinning propeller shaped particles able to make a SPIN-FLIP at the Black hole horizon and repel from it.
Then we may have a logical foundation for violation of the second law of thermodynamics at the Black hole horizon. However, in that case, the vacuum is supposed to be a super dense God particle based particle system with a memory for speed and position of particles.
In this book I will explain and describe several useful experiments to create a experimental based foundation for such a real alternative.
That is to say, to understand those new experiments, we have to change our understanding of reality by descending down to the smallest microstructures such as the Electron and the Positron and we have to go up to the largest scale: the universe as a whole including the Big bang.
We will observe that the guiding system for particles we need just like David Bohm proposed (The Pilot wave) but did not find, should be about the same system as the guiding system for our free choices and free will.
This guiding system I dubbed: Multi-universal entanglement between anti-material universes located inside the raspberry shaped multiverse.
To name a few present anomalies at the macro- and micro-scale, which are explained in this book:
The Pioneer 10/11 anomaly.
The Fly-by anomaly.
The Venus-Mercury Radar reflection anomaly.
The GPS incidental outlier anomaly.