Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 347 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
J
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
J
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
There are several links available that discuss a new paper that looks at how well ocean influences recent continental warming.

Compo,G.P., and P.D. Sardeshmukh, 2008: Oceanic influences on recent continental warming. Climate Dynamics, in press.

Motl describes it nicely as a correlation and a possible primary driver. He said, "One of the messages of the paper is that the ocean temperature should be studied more carefully and the climate should be investigated in the regional context, not just through the global averages that completely overlook many of the essential phenomena: the paper actually shows that the regional patterns were predicted completely incorrectly by two popular classes of climate models."

.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Z
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Z
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
J
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
J
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
That's right Zephir. Like Motl's wrote, "The very statement that the ocean temperature is sufficient as a 'driver' to explain the continental temperature sounds good and plausible (because of the high heat capacity of the oceans) but I am afraid that it is another example of the logical fallacy emphasized by Roy Spencer. They haven't really proven it. Correlation is not causation and even in the cases where it is, you can't quite know the direction of the causal relationship..."

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Z
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Z
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Originally Posted By: John M Reynolds
...like Motl's wrote...
With compare to L. Motl, I'm an aetherist and intuitive alarmist - so I've no problem with Motl's not quite typical stance, which infirms an article, which basically opens an alternative of anthropocentric origin of GW (providing the ocean is the primary cause of GW rather than increasing of greenhouse gases over land - as the article is proposing).

But I'm not expert in this area and I'd recommend to consider the factual arguments of both sides thoroughly.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5