Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 190 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 203
Canuck Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 203
Quote:

Beach bonfires may be banned
They fuel global warming, parks department says



Park department staff is recommending reducing bonfires at the two beaches this summer and possibly banning them altogether next year.

The park board will hear the recommendation Thursday, and the city plans to run public-service announcements and hand out brochures later this month about the effects of bonfires on global warming.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/366025_bonfire06.html?source=mypi


Banning bonfires to fight global warming? Of all the idiotic things.......
If we were really lucky these same nutjobs will attempt to lower atmospheric CO2 levels by collectively holding their breath....permanently

.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Originally Posted By: Canuck
If we were really lucky these same nutjobs will attempt to lower atmospheric CO2 levels by collectively holding their breath....permanently
Thanks for the good laugh....

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/366025_bonfire06.html?source=mypi
Originally Posted By: From the Article
Under the proposal, the department in July would reduce the number of fire rings at Alki from six currently to three and at Golden Gardens from 12 to seven.
Then later this year, the department would consider banning bonfires or requiring fees and permits to reduce the number of bonfires next year.
Parks and Recreation recommended banning the fires in 2004, after a violation notice from the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to the city after someone set a couch on fire at Alki Beach.
Sara Russell, 34, who also was walking her dog, rolled her eyes at the idea of banning bonfires to stave off global warming.
"If they really wanted to do something, they could enforce the no-cruising law, because in the summer you see so many cars cruising around here," she said.

Since the park board last heard the issue, the department assigned more staff to the two sites. The number of fires using illegal materials has dropped by two-thirds, according to the park memo.
But Mayor Greg Nickels' plan to reduce climate-threatening pollutants "begs the question of whether Seattle Parks is acting responsibly ... to systematically reduce controllable contributions to global warming," the memo said.
I'm not sure what that last comment means, but at least someone is begging the question....
Sounds as if they've got a handle on this burning of "illegal materials."

Yes Canuck, there is a lot of over-reaction, ...and under-response.
Thanks for bringing this important topic to our attention.

Hey, at least this whole GW hysteria thing is stimulating the economy; they've "assigned more staff to the two sites." That'd be a nice job duty; hanging out at the beach, checking the bonfires and making sure idiots don't add toxic materials.
It'd be fun filling out a "performance evaluation" for that one: 'I consistently attended beach parties, and engaged the beach patrons in a non-confrontational manner, eliciting the highest possible levels of compliance regarding "bonfires" and the avoidance of introduced illegal materials.' Maybe on that job I could get an "Outstanding," instead of the usual "Satisfactory" frown or "Commendable" rating.

~Later,
smile


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
Canuck

maybe its an attemp at public recognition of Global Warming.

But if you ask me , and nobody has , removing public recreational activities that have a obvious link to our ancestors , everyone's ancestors , might be a negative factor
in any attemp.

a bonfire on a beach is a speck of sand on the world.

.


3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 194
R
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 194
I fell like starting a bon fire.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3
isn't it interesting that when faced with global warming, the government chooses to react by confronting the people who have beach fires instead of corporations that can make a much huger impact on the matter.
I wonder ... crazy

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 194
R
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 194
I am beginning to think that Global Warming is not the real problem the people on this planet are facing, because sea temperature gauges are showing that not only are our oceans not getting warmer, but they are getting a bit cooler. Sure, we see obvious evidence that the planet is indeed getting warmer by simply looking at the ices of the polar regions, but I am beginning to suspect that we are really about to enter an Ice Age and the signs we are interpreting as Global Warming are really omens of that Ice Age. This is nothing more than my gut feeling.

Oh maybe the Governments are thinking the same things because if we do enter an Ice Age I think the factories spewing out their gasses might be our best defense at getting the planet back to a descent temperature. Just a thought.

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 7
A
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
A
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 7
I'm in total agreement with 'paul' on this issue:

"removing public recreational activities that have a obvious link to our ancestors , everyone's ancestors , might be a negative factor in any attemp."

Absolutely! (IMO) a main part of the problem is that people are too far removed from the environment, as it is. What a travesty this would be if it spreads to include small riverside fires and campfires in general {This is already happening here. They justify it by citing particulate and VOC counts.}!

It has long been a type of 'fetish' of mine to make a *good* fire -- one that is as efficient (fast-starting, and clean) as possible. A great pride of mine, over these past years, is to see so many others I have been around emulate my methods; From the collecting of specific fuel to the structure, initiation, and control of the fire -- all determined by location, weather, purpose...many factors. It really does teach management of limited resources (in most cases) and, naturally, minimum expendature of energy in aquiring the 'necessities.'

In the Southeast, anyways, there are often relatively large 'controlled burns' in the forests to help prevent uncontrollable wildfires. Aren't we gatherers and small-fire builders helping the situation by keeping the local ground detritus to a minimum? And wouldn't CH4 increase if it was just allowed to lie around and rot?


Last edited by Arcturus66; 07/06/08 02:31 AM. Reason: concision
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Originally Posted By: Arcturus66

It has long been a type of 'fetish' of mine to make a *good* fire -- one that is as efficient (fast-starting, and clean) as possible. A great pride of mine, over these past years, is to see so many others I have been around emulate my methods; From the collecting of specific fuel to the structure, initiation, and control of the fire -- all determined by location, weather, purpose...many factors. It really does teach management of limited resources (in most cases) and, naturally, minimum expendature of energy in aquiring the 'necessities.'
Right On!
===
.
.
Although I know this thread was started as a kinda sarcastic way of pointing out the idiocy of some GW abatement measures, I have to wonder about a "hot, flat, and crowded" world where if even 1% of people were casually burning toxic stuff, there would be something to worry about. As with guns, as long as everyone is educated and responsible, things work smoothly; but in some situations, totally unrestricted or unregulated burning might be problematic.
That being said....

I have to agree.
There is nothing quite as satisfying as building a fire. Well, okay... there are some other things; but a fire really does get right to that primal need for satisfaction.

Short of "learning to drive," there aren't many skills we can teach and pass on to our kids anymore. One of the main 'fire-skills' is minimizing smoke, of course; but along with that goes the whole point about keeping things non-toxic. I encourage them to not even put treated lumber into the fire, much less the kind of things (couches, trash) that were mentioned in the original article on this thread.

You'll only get my fire when you can pry it from my cold, dead hands.
smile


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
F
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
F
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Bonfires have many hazards. Many people are burning paper, plastic, rubber compounds, etc for bonfires. It produces huge volumes of heat and dense smoke, lasting for hours and causes global warming. Why should we go for bonfires? We should realize the importance of our earth. We are all on the same ship. How can we fire our own ship?
--------
Fletcher
Email Marketing

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Z
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Z
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
By my opinion, the beach bonfires aren't so harmless, because they just oxidize the wood, which would oxidize anyway. The bonfire does such oxidation even more effectively with respect to greenhouse gases production, as it eliminates the formation of methane during rotting, which is much more effective in greenhouse effect, then pure CO2, which is released during camping.

Of course, the rotting of waste wood isn't just the source of methane, but the source of valuate humus layer, which is the life environment for many important organisms and it can serve as an incubator of nun moths and many other borers and wood-destroying beetles as well - so that the global warming isn't the only relevant criterion of harmless here

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,490
E
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
E
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,490
Bonfires? On beaches? Why?

Camp fires I can understand, and a proper camp fires can be constructed to produce minimal smoke etc, but bonfires are a hazard anywhere, especially on a beach!

Do you light them in the summer as well as the winter?

Here in Oz (a somewhat beachy place) I can't ever remember seeing a fire on a beach! Why would you want such a dirty thing on a beach? The bonfires as described sound horrific and the waste could be disposed of much more sensibly than burning them in a bonfire on the sand!!


Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5